EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-421/23: Order of the General Court of 16 May 2024 – Versobank v ECB (Action for damages – Non-contractual liability – Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Specific supervisory tasks conferred on the ECB – Decision to withdraw a credit institution’s authorisation – Failure to comply with procedural requirements – Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure – Manifest inadmissibility)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TB0421

62023TB0421

May 16, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2024/3917

(Case T-421/23)

(Action for damages - Non-contractual liability - Economic and monetary policy - Prudential supervision of credit institutions - Specific supervisory tasks conferred on the ECB - Decision to withdraw a credit institution’s authorisation - Failure to comply with procedural requirements - Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure - Manifest inadmissibility)

(C/2024/3917)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Versobank AS (Tallinn, Estonia) (represented by: O. Behrends, lawyer)

Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: E. Yoo, A. Pizzolla and G. Marafioti, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 268 TFEU, the applicant seeks compensation for the damage it claims to have suffered as a result of, first, the adoption of Decision ECB-SSM-2018-EE2 WHD-2017-0012 of the European Central Bank (ECB) of 17 July 2018 withdrawing its authorisation as a credit institution and, secondly, the ECB’s conduct in connection with that decision.

Operative part of the order

1.The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

2.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application to intervene submitted by the Council of the European Union.

3.Versobank AS shall pay the costs, except those relating to the application to intervene.

4.The Council shall bear its own costs.

(1)

OJ C C/2023/23, 9.10.2023.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3917/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia