- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-107/13 P: Judgment of the General Court of 16 January 2015 — Trentea v FRA (Appeal — Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Recruitment — Rejection of the appellant’s application and appointment of another candidate — Plea in law raised for the first time at the hearing — Distortion of the clear sense of the evidence — Duty to state reasons — Order as to costs disputed)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62013TA0107
62013TA0107
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
23.2.2015
Official Journal of the European Union
C 65/31
(Case T-107/13 P) (<span class="super">1</span>)
((Appeal - Civil service - Members of the temporary staff - Recruitment - Rejection of the appellant’s application and appointment of another candidate - Plea in law raised for the first time at the hearing - Distortion of the clear sense of the evidence - Duty to state reasons - Order as to costs disputed))
(2015/C 065/42)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Appellant: Cornelia Trentea (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: L. Levi and M. Vandenbussche, lawyers)
Other party to the proceedings: The European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) (represented by: M. Kjærum, acting as Agent, and B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)
Re:
Appeal brought against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (First Chamber) of 11 December 2012 in Trentea v FRA (F-112/10, ECR-SC, EU:F:2012:179) and seeking to have that judgment set aside.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1)Dismisses the appeal;
2)Declares that Ms Cornelia Trentea is to bear her own costs and orders her to pay the costs incurred by the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights in the present proceedings.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 129, 4.5.2013.
Language of the case: English