I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-560/17) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
((Action for annulment - Environment - Regulation (EU) 2017/852 - Protection of human health and the environment - Prohibition on chlor-alkali production using mercury as an electrode - Article 263, fourth paragraph, TFEU - Act not of individual concern - Inadmissibility))
(2019/C 44/81)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Fortischem a.s. (Nováky, Slovakia) (represented by: C. Arhold, P. Hodál and M. Staroň, lawyers)
Defendants: European Parliament (represented by: I. McDowell, L. Darie and A. Tamás, acting as Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Moore and J. Kneale, acting as Agents)
Action under Article 263 TFEU for the annulment of letter (d) in Annex III, Part I to Regulation (EU) 2017/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2017 on mercury, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1102/2008 (OJ 2017 L 137, p. 1).
1.The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
2.There is no longer any need to rule on the applications for leave to intervene made by the European Commission and the Kingdom of Sweden.
3.Fortischem a.s. is to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union and the European Parliament, with the exception of those relating to the applications for leave to intervene.
4.Fortischem, the Council, the Parliament, the Commission and the Kingdom of Sweden are each to bear their own costs relating to the applications for leave to intervene.
(<span class="note"> <a id="ntr1-C_2019044EN.01006202-E0001" href="#ntc1-C_2019044EN.01006202-E0001">*1</a> </span> ) OJ C 369, 30.10.2017.