I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Joined Cases C-431/19 P and C-432/19 P) (*)
(Appeal - State aid - Article 106(2) TFEU - Services of general economic interest (SGEIs) - European Union framework - Application to State aid in the form of public service compensation - Postal sector - Directive 97/67/EC - Article 7 - Compensation of the net costs resulting from universal service obligations - Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market)
(2021/C 53/12)
Language of the case: Polish
Appellants: Inpost Paczkomaty sp. z o.o. (represented by: M. Doktór, radca prawny (C-431/19 P)), Inpost S.A (represented by: W. Knopkiewicz, radca prawny (C-432/19 P))
Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: D. Recchia, K. Blanck and K Herrmann, acting as Agents), Republic of Poland (represented by: B. Majczyna, acting as Agent)
The Court:
1.Dismisses the appeals;
2.Orders Inpost Paczkomaty sp. z o.o. and Inpost S.A. to pay the costs.
(*) Language of the case: Polish.
ECLI:EU:C:2021:140