I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-208/15) (<a id="ntc1-C_2017038EN.01000301-E0001" href="#ntr1-C_2017038EN.01000301-E0001"> (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)</a>)
((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Value added tax - Directive 2006/112/EC - Integrated cooperation - Grant of financing and supplies of current assets necessary for agricultural production - Single, complex supply - Distinct and independent supplies - Ancillary supply and principal supply))
(2017/C 038/03)
Language of the case: Hungarian
Applicant: Stock ‘94 Szolgáltató Zrt.
Defendant: Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Dél-dunántúli Regionális Adó Főigazgatósága
Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as meaning that:
an integrated agricultural cooperation providing that an economic operator delivers goods to a farmer and grants him a loan intended for purchasing those goods constitutes a single transaction for the purposes of that directive, in which the supply of the goods is the principal supply. The taxable amount of that single transaction is made up of both the price of those goods and the interest paid on the loans granted to the farmers;
the fact that an integrator may provide the farmers with additional services or buy their agricultural production has no bearing on the categorisation of the transaction at issue as a single transaction, for the purposes of Directive 2006/112.
(<a id="ntr1-C_2017038EN.01000301-E0001" href="#ntc1-C_2017038EN.01000301-E0001">(<span class="super">1</span>)</a> OJ C 236, 20.7.2015)