- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-585/18: Action brought on 27 September 2018 — Şanli v Council
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018TN0585
62018TN0585
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
3.12.2018
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 436/59
(Case T-585/18)
(2018/C 436/82)
Language of the case: Dutch
Parties
Applicant: Dalokay Şanli (Rotterdam, Netherlands) (represented by: D. Gürses, lawyer)
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the General Court should:
—annul the decision of the Council of 31 July 2018;
—remove the applicant from the list referred to in Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001, and
—order the Council to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Pleas in law and main arguments
1.First plea in law, alleging breach of essential formal requirements and infringement of the Treaties.
2.Second plea in law, alleging that there has been no evidence submitted in the proceedings proving that the applicant has carried out terrorist act.
3.Third plea in law, alleging that the applicant was unable to defend himself adequately in the procedure that led to the contested decision.
4.Fourth plea in law, alleging that the decision is inadequately reasoned.
5.Fifth plea in law, alleging that the decision was adopted in infringement of the principles of subsidiarity and of proportionality.
6.Sixth plea in law, alleging that Regulation No 2580/2001 is not applicable given that the PKK is not a terrorist organisation.
7.Seventh plea in law, alleging that the adopted decision is contrary to the principle of proportionality.