- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-92/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 25 February 2013 — Gemeente ’s-Hertogenbosch v Staatssecretaris van Financiën
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62013CN0092
62013CN0092
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 147/11
(Case C-92/13)
2013/C 147/19
Language of the case: Dutch
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Gemeente ’s-Hertogenbosch
Defendant: Staatssecretaris van Financiën
Question referred
Should Article 5(7)(a) of the Sixth Directive be interpreted as meaning that supplies are made for consideration in a situation in which a municipality takes first occupation of a building which it has had built on its own land and which it is to use at the rate of 94 % for its activities as a public authority and at the rate of 6 % for its activities as a taxable person, including 1 % for exempt activities to which no right of deduction applies?
Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonization of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1).
* * *
Language of the case: Dutch
* * *