EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-665/13: Action brought on 16 December 2013 — Zitro IP v OHIM — Gamepoint (SPIN BINGO)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62013TN0665

62013TN0665

December 16, 2013
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 61/13

(Case T-665/13)

2014/C 61/22

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Zitro IP Sàrl. (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: A. Canela Giménez, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Gamepoint BV (The Hague, Netherlands)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 14 October 2013 given in Case R 1388/2012-4;

Order the defendant and the other party, should it intervene, to bear the costs of proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Community trade mark concerned: The coloured figurative mark in colours containing the verbal element ‘SPIN BINGO’ for goods and services in Classes 9, 41 and 42 — Community trade mark application No 9 545 658

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Mark or sign cited in opposition: The word mark ‘ZITRO SPIN BINGO’ for goods and services in Classes 9, 28 and 41 — Community trade mark registration No 9 058 868

Decision of the Opposition Division: Upheld the opposition in part

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annuled the contested decision and rejected the opposition

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) CTMR.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia