I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
2014/C 61/22
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Zitro IP Sàrl. (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: A. Canela Giménez, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Gamepoint BV (The Hague, Netherlands)
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 14 October 2013 given in Case R 1388/2012-4;
—Order the defendant and the other party, should it intervene, to bear the costs of proceedings.
Applicant for a Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Community trade mark concerned: The coloured figurative mark in colours containing the verbal element ‘SPIN BINGO’ for goods and services in Classes 9, 41 and 42 — Community trade mark application No 9 545 658
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant
Mark or sign cited in opposition: The word mark ‘ZITRO SPIN BINGO’ for goods and services in Classes 9, 28 and 41 — Community trade mark registration No 9 058 868
Decision of the Opposition Division: Upheld the opposition in part
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annuled the contested decision and rejected the opposition
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) CTMR.