EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.
Case T-461/14: Action brought on 20 June 2014 — Arocasa v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014TN0461
62014TN0461
June 20, 2014
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 253/63
(Case T-461/14)
2014/C 253/85
Language of the case: Spanish
Parties
Applicant: Arocasa, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J. García Muñoz, J. Jiménez-Blanco Carrillo de Albornoz and J. Corral García, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision; and
—order the Commission to pay all the costs incurred in the proceedings.
Pleas in law and main arguments
The pleas in law and main arguments are those raised in Case T-392/14 Gutser v Commission.
EurLex Case Law
AI-Powered Case Law Search
Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions
Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free TrialAt Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.