- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-774/22, FTI Touristik: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Nürnberg (Germany) lodged on 21 December 2022 — JX v FTI Touristik GmbH
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022CN0774
62022CN0774
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
27.3.2023
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 112/25
(Case C-774/22, FTI Touristik)
(2023/C 112/32)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: JX
Defendant: FTI Touristik GmbH
Question referred
Is Article 18(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (Article 18(1) of the Brussels I Regulation) to be interpreted as meaning that, in addition to providing for international jurisdiction, the rule also concerns a provision on the territorial jurisdiction of national courts in matters relating to a travel contract where both the consumer, as a traveller, and the other party to the contract, the tour operator[,] have their seat in the same Member State, but the travel destination is situated not in that Member State but abroad (so-called ‘false internal cases’) with the consequence that the consumer can make contractual claims against the tour operator supplementing national provisions on jurisdiction at the court of his or her place of residence?
(1) OJ 2012 L 351, p. 1.