- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-912/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 13 December 2019 — Agrimotion S.A. v ADAMA Deutschland GmbH
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019CN0912
62019CN0912
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
23.3.2020
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 95/15
(Case C-912/19)
(2020/C 95/16)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Defendant and appellant: Agrimotion S.A.
Applicant and respondent: ADAMA Deutschland GmbH
Question referred
Can an undertaking which places a plant protection product authorised in the Member State of origin on the market of the Member State of introduction rely on the parallel trade permit granted by the competent authority of the Member State of introduction to a third undertaking, if the canisters containing the plant protection product and in which that product is placed on the market of the Member State of introduction indicate both the holder of the permit and the importing undertaking? If there are any additional requirements, what are they? (1)
(1) Pursuant to Article 52 of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market and repealing Council Directives 79/117/EEC and 91/414/EEC (OJ 2009 L 309, p. 1).