- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-45/16 P: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 26 January 2017 — d.d. Synergy Hellas Anonymi Emporiki Etaireia Parochis Ypiresion Pliroforikis v Commission (Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — ‘Multi-level patient-specific artery and artherogenesis model for outcome prediction, decision support treatment, and virtual hand-on training (ARTreat) contract’, concluded under the Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) — Termination of that contract due to irregularities committed in the performance of another contract concluded with the European Commission — Good faith — Legitimate expectation the contract would not be terminated)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016CB0045
62016CB0045
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 104/23
(Case C-45/16 P) (<a id="ntc1-C_2017104EN.01002301-E0001" href="#ntr1-C_2017104EN.01002301-E0001"> (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)</a>
((Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - ‘Multi-level patient-specific artery and artherogenesis model for outcome prediction, decision support treatment, and virtual hand-on training (ARTreat) contract’, concluded under the Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) - Termination of that contract due to irregularities committed in the performance of another contract concluded with the European Commission - Good faith - Legitimate expectation the contract would not be terminated))
(2017/C 104/33)
Language of the case: Greek
Parties
Appellant: d.d. Synergy Hellas Anonymi Emporiki Etaireia Parochis Ypiresion Pliroforikis (represented by: K. Damis, dikigoros)
Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal, acting as Agent)
Operative part of the order
1.The appeal is dismissed.
(<a id="ntr1-C_2017104EN.01002301-E0001" href="#ntc1-C_2017104EN.01002301-E0001">(<span class="super">1</span>)</a> <a href="./../../../../legal-content/EN/AUTO/?uri=OJ:C:2016:098:TOC">OJ C 98, 14.03.2016</a>.)