EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-693/20 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 March 2023 — Intermarché Casino Achats v European Commission, Council of the European Union (Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Decision of the European Commission ordering an inspection — Remedies against the conduct of the inspection — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Right to an effective remedy — Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Article 19 — Regulation (EC) No 773/2004 — Article 3 — Recording of interviews conducted by the Commission during its investigations — Starting point of the Commission’s investigation)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020CA0693

62020CA0693

March 9, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/4

(Case C-693/20 P) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)

(Appeal - Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Decision of the European Commission ordering an inspection - Remedies against the conduct of the inspection - Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Right to an effective remedy - Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 - Article 19 - Regulation (EC) No 773/2004 - Article 3 - Recording of interviews conducted by the Commission during its investigations - Starting point of the Commission’s investigation)

(2023/C 155/04)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Intermarché Casino Achats (represented by: F. Abouzeid, S. Eder, J. Jourdan, C. Mussi and Y. Utzschneider, Avocats)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: P. Berghe, A. Cleenewerck de Crayencour, A. Dawes and I. V. Rogalski, acting as Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: A.-L. Meyer and O. Segnana, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Sets aside point 2 of the operative part of the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 5 October 2020, Intermarché Casino Achats v Commission (T-254/17, not published, EU:T:2020:459);

2.Sets aside point 3 of the operative part of the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 5 October 2020, Intermarché Casino Achats v Commission (T-254/17, not published, EU:T:2020:459) in so far as it ruled on costs;

3.Annuls Commission Decision C(2017) 1056 final of 9 February 2017, ordering Intermarché Casino Achats and all companies directly or indirectly controlled by it to submit to an inspection in accordance with Article 20(1) and (4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 (Case AT.40466 — Tute 1);

4.Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Intermarché Casino Achats SARL, both at first instance and in the appeal proceedings;

5.Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs, both at first instance and in the appeal proceedings.

(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 62, 22.2.2021.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia