I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Reserve list for an open competition and individual decisions concerning the appointment of officials – Refusal of access – Exception concerning privacy and the integrity of the individual – Protection of personal data – Regulation (EC) No 45/2001
3. Acts of the institutions – Statement of reasons – Obligation – Scope – Reasoning put forward during proceedings not mentioned in the contested decision – Not permissible (Art. 253 EC) (see para. 107)
Re:
APPLICATION for annulment of the decision of the Commission of 10 February 2004 refusing the applicant’s request for access to the reserve list for open competition A7/A6 COM/A/637 and the individual decisions appointing officials in Grade A 6 from 5 October 1995.
The Court:
1.Annuls the decision of the Commission of the European Communities of 10 February 2004 refusing to give Mr Gregorio Valero Jordana access to the reserve list for open competition A7/A6 COM/A/637 and the individual decisions appointing officials in Grade A 6 from 5 October 1995;
2.Orders the Commission to bear its own costs and to pay Mr Valero Jordana’s costs;
3.Orders the Kingdom of Sweden to bear its own costs;
4.Orders the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) to bear his own costs;
5.Removes the Kingdom of Denmark as an intervener in Case T‑161/04;
6.Orders the Kingdom of Denmark to bear its own costs;
7.Orders Mr Valero Jordana, the Commission, the Kingdom of Sweden and the EDPS to bear their own costs in regard to the Kingdom of Denmark’s intervention.