EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-332/22: Action brought on 2 June 2022 — TotalEnergies Marketing Nederland v Commission

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TN0332

62022TN0332

June 2, 2022
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

8.8.2022

Official Journal of the European Union

C 303/51

(Case T-332/22)

(2022/C 303/66)

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Applicant: TotalEnergies Marketing Nederland NV (The Hague, Netherlands) (represented by: C. van Heezik, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

annul the Commission decision of 23 March 2022 in case numbers GASTDEM 2021/4203, 2021/4204, 2021/4205, 2021/4206 and 2021/4207 with a view to ensuring that the documents concerned must still be made public;

order the Commission to pay the costs incurred by the applicant in these proceedings, including the costs incurred by it in connection with legal aid.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.

1.First plea in law, alleging that the Commission wrongly and unlawfully failed to submit an inventory list and wrongly failed to provide reasons for why no inventory list was submitted. A full refusal of the inventory list is disproportionate and is disproportionate to the aim pursued. In particular, it is impossible to see how the provision of the inventory list sought will harm the commercial interests and investigations within the meaning of Article 4(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001.

2.Second plea in law, alleging that the Commission wrongly and unlawfully brought the data GESTDEM 2021/4203 and GESTDEM 2021/4204 within the scope of a general presumption of confidentiality. The applicant does not see how any communication between the Commission and the Netherlands competition authority should belong in the administrative file. Documents which are not part of that file cannot simply be brought within that presumption.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia