I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Appeal – State aid – Aid granted to public utilities – Tax exemptions – Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the common market – Action for annulment – Admissibility – Locus standi – Legal interest – Article 87 EC – Concept of ‘aid’ – Article 88 EC – Concept of ‘new aid’ – Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 – Articles 1 and 14 – Lawfulness of a recovery order – Duty to state reasons
Re:
Appeal brought against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 11 June 2009 in Case T‑297/02 ACEA v Commission by which that court dismissed the action brought for annulment of Articles 2 and 3 of Commission Decision 2003/193/EC of 5 June 2002 on State aid granted by Italy in the form of tax exemptions and subsidised loans to public utilities with a majority public capital holding (OJ 2003 L 77, p. 21).
The Court:
1.Dismisses the main appeal and the cross-appeal;
2.Orders ACEA SpA to pay the costs of the main appeal;
3.Orders the European Commission to pay the costs of the cross-appeal;
4.Orders Iride SpA to pay its own costs.