- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-204/09: Judgment of the General Court of 5 May 2011 — Olymp Bezner v OHIM — Bellido (OLYMP) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark OLYMP — Earlier national figurative mark OLIMPO — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62009TA0204
62009TA0204
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
25.6.2011
Official Journal of the European Union
C 186/21
(Case T-204/09)(<span class="super">1</span>)
(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community figurative mark OLYMP - Earlier national figurative mark OLIMPO - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
2011/C 186/38
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Olymp Bezner GmbH & Co. KG (Bietigheim-Bissingen, Germany) (represented by: M. Eck and J. Dönch, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Miguel Bellido, SA (Manzanares, Spain)
Re:
ACTION brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 5 March 2009 (Case R 598/2008-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Miguel Bellido SA and Olymp Bezner GmbH & Co. KG
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Olymp Bezner GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 167, 18.7.2009.