- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-146/17: Action brought on 7 March 2017 — Mondi v ACER
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017TN0146
62017TN0146
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
24.4.2017
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 129/34
(Case T-146/17)
(2017/C 129/52)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Mondi AG (Vienna, Austria) (represented by: B. Rajal, lawyer)
Defendant: Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER)
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the decision given by the Board of Appeal of the defendant on 17 February 2017 in Case A-001-2017 (consolidated) concerning the rejection of the application for leave to intervene lodged by the applicant; and
—order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law:
1.First plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 11 of the Rules of Procedure of the Board of Appeal of the defendant and infringement of Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, since the Board of Appeal erred in finding that the applicant had no legitimate interest in the outcome of the appeal proceedings.
2.Second plea in law, alleging infringement of the right to be heard, since the Board of Appeal failed to notify the applicant of the position taken by the defendant in relation to the application made by the applicant for leave to intervene.