I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-382/21) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark airscreen - Earlier EU word mark AIRSCREEN - Article 8(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
(2022/C 198/73)
Language of the case: German
Applicant: the airscreen company GmbH & Co. KG (Münster, Germany) (represented by: O. Spieker, A. Schönfleisch and N. Willich, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Hanf, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: Moviescreens Rental GmbH (Damme, Germany) (represented by: D. Schulz and P. Stelzig, lawyers)
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 5 May 2021 (Case R 1990/2020-4), concerning opposition proceedings between the airscreen company and Moviescreens Rental.
1.The action is dismissed.
2.the airscreen company GmbH & Co. KG shall pay the costs.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 329, 16.8.2021.