I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for figurative Community trade mark Charlott France Entre Luxe et Tradition – Earlier figurative national mark Charlot – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 43(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94
Community trade mark – Observations of third parties and opposition – Examination of the opposition – Proof of use of the earlier mark (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 43(2) and (3) (see paras 37, 64)
ACTION brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 24 April 2006 (Case R 223/2005‑2) concerning opposition proceedings between Charlo – Confecções para Homens, Artigos de Lã e Outros SA and Charlott SARL.
Applicant for the Community trade mark:
Community trade mark sought:
Figurative mark Charlott France Entre Luxe et Tradition for goods in Class 25 – Application No 1853274
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:
Charlo – Confecções para Homens, Artigos de Lã e Outros SA
Mark or sign cited in opposition:
National figurative mark Charlot for goods in Class 25
Decision of the Opposition Division:
Rejection of the opposition
Decision of the Board of Appeal:
Decision of the Opposition Division set aside
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Charlott SARL to pay the costs, except those incurred by the intervener;
3.Orders Charlo – Confecções para Homens, Artigos de Lã e Outros SA to bear its own costs.