I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2019/C 246/41)
Language in which the application was lodged: Italian
Applicant: Arrigo Cipriani (Venice, Italy) (represented by: S. Bergia and G. Sironi, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Hotel Cipriani Srl (Venice, Italy)
Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark ARRIGO CIPRIANI — Application for registration No 14 063 838
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 March 2019 in Case R 406/2018-4
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—reject the opposition filed by Hotel Cipriani s.r.l., or refer the case back to EUIPO in order that it may give a decision in accordance with the judgment;
—order full reimbursement of the costs of the present proceedings, including those of the previous procedural stages before EUIPO, in favour of Arrigo Cipriani.
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 18 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 47(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 10(3) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.