- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-163/23, Palognali: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 March 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Giudice di pace di Bologna – Italy) – Governo della Repubblica italiana v UX (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to present the reasons justifying the need for an interpretation of certain provisions of European Union law by the Court of Justice – Lack of sufficient details – Manifest inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CB0163
62023CB0163
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2025/3256
24.6.2025
(Case C-163/23,
(1)
Palognali)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Requirement to present the reasons justifying the need for an interpretation of certain provisions of European Union law by the Court of Justice - Lack of sufficient details - Manifest inadmissibility)
(C/2025/3256)
Language of the case: Italian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Governo della Repubblica italiana
Defendant: UX
Operative part of the order
The request for a preliminary ruling from the Giudice di pace di Bologna (Magistrates’ Court, Bologna, Italy), made by decision of 25 January 2023, is manifestly inadmissible.
—
(1)
OJ C 189, 30.5.2023.
(2) The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3256/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—