I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(Action for annulment - EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark fluff - Earlier EU word mark FLUFF - Disregard of procedural requirements - Manifest inadmissibility)
(C/2025/1771)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Ghost – Corporate Management SA (Lisbon, Portugal) (represented by: P. Malheiro Lima, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Ringelhann, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Nacomi Group sp. z o.o. (Wilkowice, Poland) (represented by: W. Wroński, lawyer)
By its action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 29 January 2024 (Case R 1609/2023-2).
1.The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.
2.Ghost – Corporate Management SA shall pay the costs incurred by Nacomi Group sp. z o.o.
3.The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall bear its own costs.
—
(1) OJ C C/2024/3177, 21.5.2024.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1771/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—