I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
—
(2019/C 305/34)
Language of the case: English
Appellant: ABLV Bank AS (represented by: O.H. Behrends, M. Kirchner, Rechtsanwälte)
Other party to the proceedings: European Central Bank (ECB)
The appellant claims that the Court should:
—set aside the order of the General Court of 6 May 2019 in case T-281/18;
—declare that the application for annulment is admissible;
—refer the case back to the General Court for it to determine the action for annulment; and
—order the ECB to pay the appellant's costs and the costs of the appeal.
The appellant puts forward two pleas in law in support of its appeal:
1)That the General Court erred in law and violated Art. 263 TFEU by failing to base its order on the decision which the ECB actually adopted.
2)That the order under appeal is based on an incorrect interpretation of Art. 18(1) SRMR (1).
* Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 July 2014 establishing uniform rules and a uniform procedure for the resolution of credit institutions and certain investment firms in the framework of a Single Resolution Mechanism and a Single Resolution Fund and amending Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 (OJ 2014, L 225, p. 1).
—
* * *