- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-79/20: Order of the General Court of 14 July 2021 — AI v ECDC (Action for annulment and for damages — Civil service — ECDC staff — Psychological harassment — Article 12a of the Staff Regulations — Damage to reputation — Request for assistance — Article 24 of the Staff Regulations — Dismissal of application — Right to be heard — Absence of prima facie evidence — Duty of care — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TB0079
62020TB0079
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 382/25
(Case T-79/20) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Action for annulment and for damages - Civil service - ECDC staff - Psychological harassment - Article 12a of the Staff Regulations - Damage to reputation - Request for assistance - Article 24 of the Staff Regulations - Dismissal of application - Right to be heard - Absence of prima facie evidence - Duty of care - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
(2021/C 382/36)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: AI (represented by: L. Levi and A. Champetier, lawyers)
Defendant: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (represented by: A. Iber and J. Mannheim, acting as Agents, and by D. Waelbroeck and A. Duron, lawyers)
Re:
Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of ECDC’s decision of 5 April 2019 rejecting the applicant’s request for assistance of 10 April 2018 and, in so far as necessary, of ECDC’s decision of 4 November 2019 rejecting the complaint against the decision of 5 April 2019 and, secondly, compensation for the damage suffered.
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed.
2.AI is ordered to pay the costs.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 129, 20.4.2020.