- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-119/23, Valančius: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 29 July 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Vilniaus apygardos administracinis teismas – Lithuania) – Virgilijus Valančius v Lietuvos Republikos Vyriausybė (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Third subparagraph of Article 19(2) TEU – Second paragraph of Article 254 TFEU – Appointment of Judges of the General Court of the European Union – Independence beyond doubt – Ability required for appointment to high judicial office – National procedure for proposing a candidate for the office of Judge of the General Court of the European Union – Group of independent experts responsible for assessing the candidates – Merit list of candidates meeting the requirements laid down in the third subparagraph of Article 19(2) TEU and the second paragraph of Article 254 TFEU – Proposal of a candidate named on the merit list other than the top-ranked candidate – Opinion of the panel provided for in Article 255 TFEU on the suitability of candidates)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CA0119
62023CA0119
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2024/5774
7.10.2024
(Case C-119/23,
Valančius)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Third subparagraph of Article 19(2) TEU - Second paragraph of Article 254 TFEU - Appointment of Judges of the General Court of the European Union - Independence beyond doubt - Ability required for appointment to high judicial office - National procedure for proposing a candidate for the office of Judge of the General Court of the European Union - Group of independent experts responsible for assessing the candidates - Merit list of candidates meeting the requirements laid down in the third subparagraph of Article 19(2) TEU and the second paragraph of Article 254 TFEU - Proposal of a candidate named on the merit list other than the top-ranked candidate - Opinion of the panel provided for in Article 255 TFEU on the suitability of candidates)
(C/2024/5774)
Language of the case: Lithuanian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Virgilijus Valančius
Defendant: Lietuvos Republikos Vyriausybė
Other parties: Lietuvos Respublikos Seimo kanceliarija, Lietuvos Respublikos Prezidento kanceliarija, Saulius Lukas Kalėda
Operative part of the judgment
must be interpreted as not precluding the government of a Member State, which has established a group of independent experts responsible for evaluating candidates for the office of Judge of the General Court of the European Union and drawing up a merit list of candidates meeting the requirements laid down in those provisions, from proposing, from among the candidates on that list, a candidate other than the best-ranked candidate, provided that the candidate proposed satisfies those requirements.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5774/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—