I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2017/C 424/58)
Language of the case: Spanish
Applicants: La Guirigaña, S.L. (Madrid, Spain) and seven other applicants (represented by: J. Díaz-Patón Porras, lawyer)
Defendants: European Central Bank and Single Resolution Board
The applicants claim that the General Court should take note that an application has been lodged alleging that the European Union has incurred financial liability in respect of acts and omissions attributable to the European Central Bank and take note of the joint lodging of an action against the Decision of the Single Resolution Board of 7 June 2017 and, following the appropriate legal procedure, should:
—Declare that the European Union has incurred financial liability towards the applicants;
—Annul the Single Resolution Board’s decision of 7 June 2017, depriving it of effect,
—In the alternative, should the Court not uphold the aforementioned claims, order that the Single Resolution Board compensate the applicants.
The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those put forward in Cases T-478/17, Mutualidad de la Abogacía and Hermandad Nacional de Arquitectos Superiores y Químicos v Single Resolution Board, T-481/17, Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán el Bueno and SFL v Single Resolution Board, T-482/17, Comercial Vascongada Recalde v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-483/17, García Suárez and Others v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-484/17, Fidesban and Others v Single Resolution Board, T-497/17, Sáchez del Valle and Calatrava Real State 2015 v Commission and Single Resolution Board, and T-498/17, Pablo Álvarez de Linera Granda v Commission and Single Resolution Board.