- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-338/19: Action brought on 6 June 2019 — UE v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TN0338
62019TN0338
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
5.8.2019
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 263/50
(Case T-338/19)
(2019/C 263/58)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: UE (represented by: S. Rodrigues and A. Champetier, avocats)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the Commission decision dated 1 August 2018 rejecting the applicant’s request to recognise an occupational disease;
—if needed, annul the Commission decision dated 5 March 2019 rejecting the applicant’s complaint dated 5 November 2018;
—order the reimbursement of the applicant’s incurred costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging a manifest error of interpretation of the reasonableness of the period of time in which the occupational disease request has been lodged.
2.Second plea in law, alleging the misuse of power.
3.Third plea in law, alleging the breach of the rights of defence and of the duty to state reasons.