EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 9 July 2008. # Jan Kuchta v European Central Bank. # Public service. # Case F-89/07.

ECLI:EU:F:2008:97

62007FJ0089

July 9, 2008
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

(Civil service – ECB staff – Annual salary and bonus review – Exercise for 2006 – Protection of personal data – Comments adversely affecting career – Powers)

Application: brought under Article 36.2 of the Protocol on the Statutes of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank (ECB) Annexed to the EC Treaty, in which Mr Kuchta, a member of the ECB staff, seeks, first, an order for the ECB to compensate him for the non-material damage it allegedly caused him by communicating his assessment report for 2006, in its entirety, to his immediate superior in the new department to which he was assigned at the beginning of 2007, and, secondly, annulment of the decision fixing his individual salary increase on 1 January 2007.

Held: The ECB’s decision fixing the applicant’s individual salary increase on 1 January 2007 is annulled. The remainder of the claims in the application are dismissed. The ECB is to bear all the costs.

Summary

1. Officials – Non-contractual liability of the institutions – Claim for nominal damages

(Protocol on the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank, Arts 12.3 and 36.1; Rules of Procedure of the Executive Board of the European Central Bank, Art. 5; Conditions of Employment for Staff of the European Central Bank, Annex I, para. 6)

1. In a claim for compensation brought by an official, the fact that the official has applied for nominal damages does not relieve him of providing conclusive proof of the damage suffered.

(see para. 36)

See:

26/74 Roquette Frères v Commission [1976] ECR 677, para. 24

Furthermore, the fact that it is impossible to determine who took a decision on an individual salary increase and which authority was deemed to have been empowered to do so through delegation by the Executive Board undermines the principles of good administration in staff management, which require the division of powers within a Community institution to be clearly defined and duly published. In that respect, the management bodies of the European Central Bank are not in any different position from that in which the management bodies of other Community bodies and institutions find themselves in their relations with their staff.

(see paras 53, 54, 59, 61-63)

See:

C-409/02 P Pflugradt v ECB [2004] ECR I‑9873, para. 37; C-301/02 P Tralli v ECB [2005] ECR I‑4071, para. 43

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia