I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-422/18) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
(Action for annulment - Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents relating to a procedure initiated by the Commission against a Member State - Documents originating from the applicant - Third party access request - Initial decision to grant partial access - Lack of purpose - Inadmissibility)
(2019/C 230/63)
Language of the case: French
Applicant: Régie autonome des transports parisiens (RATP) (Paris, France) (represented initially by: E. Morgan de Rivery, P. Delelis and C. Lavin, and subsequently by P. Delelis and C. Lavin, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Buchet, W. Mölls and C. Ehrbar, acting as Agents)
Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision of the Commission’s Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport of 5 March 2018 on a request for access to documents originating from the RATP in so far as it grants partial access to those documents.
1.The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
2.Régie autonome des transports parisiens (RATP) is ordered to pay the costs.
(<span class="note"> <a id="ntr1-C_2019230EN.01005002-E0001" href="#ntc1-C_2019230EN.01005002-E0001">*1</a> </span>) OJ C 364, 8.10.2018.