- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 November 2011.#Glaxo Group Ltd v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).#Community trade mark - Applicant represented by a lawyer who is a not a third person - Inadmissibility.#Case T-243/11.
ECLI:EU:T:2011:649
62011TO0243
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-243/11)
Community trade mark – Applicant represented by a lawyer who is a not a third party – Inadmissibility
Procedure – Application initiating proceedings – Formal requirements – Conditions relating to a signatory – Third party capacity in relation to the parties – Application signed by an internal lawyer of a group company – Inadmissibility (Statute of the Court of Justice, Arts 19 and 21, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 43(1), first para.) (see paras 13, 15, 18-19)
Re:
ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 25 February 2011 (Case R 665/2010-4), concerning opposition proceedings between Farmodiética – Cosmética, Dietética e Produtos Farmacêuticos, L da and Glaxo Group Ltd.
Operative part
1.The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
2.Glaxo Group Ltd is ordered pay the costs.