- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-189/24, Tudmur: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberverwaltungsgericht für das Land Nordrhein-Westfalen (Germany) lodged on 8 March 2024 – QS v Bundesrepublik Deutschland
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024CN0189
62024CN0189
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2024/3894
(Case C-189/24, Tudmur)
(C/2024/3894)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: QS
Defendant: Bundesrepublik Deutschland
Questions referred
1.Is the second subparagraph of Article 3(2) of Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 to be interpreted as meaning that there are systemic flaws in the asylum procedure and the reception conditions for applicants in the Member State primarily designated as responsible, resulting in a risk of inhuman or degrading treatment within the meaning of Article 4 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, where that Member State refuses in principle to (take back or) take charge of asylum seekers, for an indefinite period of time, on account of a State-ordered suspension of the acceptance of transfers?
2.If Question 1 is to be answered in the negative, is the second subparagraph of Article 3(2) of Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 to be interpreted as meaning that the rules of EU law on the determination of the facts, which require the establishment of objective, reliable, specific and properly updated information on the asylum procedure and the reception conditions for applicants to be transferred, are restricted where the adjudicating court cannot obtain that information and would be able to determine only a hypothetical set of facts because the Member State in question refuses in principle to (take back or) take charge of asylum seekers, for an indefinite period of time, on account of a State-ordered suspension of the acceptance of transfers?
The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.
Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national or a stateless person (OJ 2013 L 180, p. 31).
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3894/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—