EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-243/25, ING Bank Śląski: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy w Przemyślu (Poland) lodged on 28 March 2025 – M. H. v ING Bank Śląski S.A.

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62025CN0243

62025CN0243

March 28, 2025
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

C series

C/2025/3501

7.7.2025

(Case C-243/25, ING Bank Śląski)

(C/2025/3501)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: M. H.

Defendant: ING Bank Śląski S.A.

Questions referred

(1)Must Article 3(1) of Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts (1) be interpreted as meaning that a contractual term can be regarded as unfair for the sole reason that, as regards the variable rate of interest on a loan, it refers to a benchmark, the amount of which is set forth by a third party, which in that regard is not subject to proper institutional supervision under the generally applicable provisions – in force at the time of conclusion of the contract – and the lender has indirect influence on the amount of that benchmark?

(2)Must Article 4(2) of [Directive 93/13/EEC] be interpreted as meaning that the drafting in plain, intelligible language of the terms concerning the principal obligations of the parties includes an obligation on the trader to inform the consumer of a potential economic risk associated with the lack of appropriate provisions of national law – at the time of conclusion of the contract – concerning the supervision of a third party which sets forth the amount of the benchmark used to set the amount of the consumer’s obligation?

(1) OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3501/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia