EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-521/21: Action brought on 26 August 2021 — 6Minutes Media v EUIPO — ad pepper media International (ad pepper the e-advertising network)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TN0521

62021TN0521

August 26, 2021
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

18.10.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 422/26

(Case T-521/21)

(2021/C 422/35)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: 6Minutes Media GmbH (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: N. Marquard and P. Koch, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: ad pepper media International NV (Nuremberg, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark ad pepper the e-advertising network in grey and red — EU trade mark No 9 680 737

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 June 2021 in Case R 1621/2020-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul the contested decision in so far as it dismissed the application for revocation of EU trade mark No 9 680 737 and revoke EU trade mark No 9 680 737 in its entirety;

order the defendant and — in the event of formal intervention — also the other party before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs of the proceedings, including the costs incurred by the applicant.

Pleas in law

Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 18(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 18(1)(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council by the defendant’s decision which is vitiated by an error of law without proof of genuine use.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia