I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2023/C 112/51)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Vinet Miłosz Jeleń (Mszalnica, Poland) (represented by: M. Bac-Matuszewska, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: The Animal Store, Food and Accessories, SL (Valencia, Spain)
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark WILD INSPIRED — Application for registration No 18 334 973
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 December 2022 in Case R 1299/2022-2
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.