EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-527/08: Action brought on 4 December 2008 — Commission v TMT Pragma

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62008TN0527

62008TN0527

January 1, 2008
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/46

(Case T-527/08)

(2009/C 32/89)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M. Moretto, lawyer, and A.M Rouchaud-Joët and F. Mirza, Agents)

Defendant: TMT Pragma (Rome, Italy)

Form of order sought

Order the defendant to pay to the Commission the principal sum of EUR 30 700,23, together with default interest at the statutory legal rate in Spain from 29 August 2004 until payment in full of the amount due;

Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The subject-matter of the present action is a request that the defendant be ordered to repay a sum amounting to EUR 30 700,23 together with default interest. That sum represents a part of the contribution paid by the applicant in execution of contract No UR-96-SC.1105, entered into under the auspices of the Fourth Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development. The contract, which was concluded with other European research centres, provided for the development of a programme entitled ‘Integrated urban transport projects and market-orientated urban transport systems/on-demand urban transport systems — INTRAMUROS’.

In support of its claims, the applicant argues that it became apparent from the audit carried out in June 2000 that certain personnel expenses, the travel and accommodation expenses and the expenses in respect of consumables and information technology were not justified and therefore could not be charged to the project.

By debit note of 14 July 2004, the Commission notified the defendant that it sought reimbursement of the amount in question, together, if appropriate, with default interest in the event of non-payment.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia