- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-524/12: Judgment of the General Court of 21 November 2013 — Recaro v OHIM — Certino Mode (RECARO) (Community trade mark — Revocation proceedings — Community word mark RECARO — Genuine use of the mark — Article 15(15)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Nature of the use of the mark — Admissibility of new evidence — Article 76(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Obligation to state reasons — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62012TA0524
62012TA0524
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
11.1.2014
Official Journal of the European Union
C 9/23
(Case T-524/12)(1)
(Community trade mark - Revocation proceedings - Community word mark RECARO - Genuine use of the mark - Article 15(15)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Nature of the use of the mark - Admissibility of new evidence - Article 76(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 - Obligation to state reasons - Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009)
2014/C 9/38
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Recaro Holding GmbH, formerly Recaro Beteiligungs-GmbH (Stuttgart (Germany)) (represented by: J. Weiser, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Certino Mode SL (Elche (Spain))
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 6 September 2012 (Case R 1761/2011-1) relating to revocation proceedings between Recaro Beteiligungs-GmbH and Certino Mode SL
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Recaro Holding GmbH to pay the costs.
(1)
OJ C 32, 2.2.2013.