I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Community trade mark - Application for the Community word mark RAUTARUUKKI - Absolute grounds for refusal of registration - Descriptive character - Absence of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and Article 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Evidence offered in support)
(2009/C 6/44)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Rautaruukki Oyj (Helsinki, Finland) (represented by: P. Hagman, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Laitinen, Agent)
ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 20 July 2006 (Case R 48/2006-4) concerning the registration of the word mark RAUTARUUKKI as a Community trade mark.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Rautaruukki Oyj to pay the costs.
* * *
(1) OJ C 281, 18.11.2006.