I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-258/18) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
(Request for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - EEC-Turkey Association Agreement - Article 59 of the Additional Protocol - Decision No 3/80 - Social security for Turkish migrant workers - Waiver of residence clauses - Article 6 - Supplementary benefits - Suspension - Renunciation of the nationality of the host Member State - Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 - Special non-contributory cash benefits - Residence requirement)
(2020/C 137/33)
Language of the case: Dutch
Applicant: H. Solak
Defendant: Raad van bestuur van het Uitvoeringsinstituut werknemersverzekeringen (Uwv)
Article 6(1), first paragraph, of Decision No 3/80 of the Association Council of 19 September 1980 on the application of the social security schemes of the Member States of the European Communities to Turkish workers and members of their families, read together with Article 59 of the Additional Protocol, signed on 23 November 1970 at Brussels and concluded, approved and confirmed on behalf of the European Economic Community by Council Regulation (EEC) No 2760/72 of 19 December 1972, must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation pursuant to which the payment of a benefit intended to supplement an invalidity pension in order to ensure a minimum income, granted in accordance with that legislation, is suspended with regard to a Turkish national, duly registered as belonging to the labour force of a Member State who, after renouncing the citizenship of a Member State which he had acquired during his residence in that State, has returned to his country of origin.
(<span class="note">1</span>) OJ C 276, 6.8.2018.
* * *