I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-122/21) (*)
(Civil service - Officials - Evaluation report - 2018 and 2019 evaluation exercises - Unsatisfactory evaluation of managerial performance - General implementing provisions of Article 43 of the Staff Regulations - Validation procedure - Principle of impartiality - Manifest error of assessment)
(2022/C 303/50)
Language of the case: French
Applicant: QI (represented by: N. de Montigny, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Mongin and L. Hohenecker, acting as Agents)
By her action under Article 270 TFEU, lodged at the Court Registry on 25 February 2022, the applicant seeks annulment of her evaluation reports drawn up for the 2018 and 2019 evaluation exercises and of the decision of 16 November 2020 rejecting her complaint against those reports.
The Court:
1.Annuls QI’s evaluation report drawn up for the 2019 evaluation exercise;
2.Dismisses the action as to the remainder;
3.Orders the parties to bear their own costs.
(*) Language of the case: French.
(1) OJ C 138, 19.4.2021.