- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-438/23: Action brought on 31 July 2023 — Lotum one v EUIPO — Playtika Santa Monica (WORDBLITZ)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TN0438
62023TN0438
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
11.9.2023
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 321/66
(Case T-438/23)
(2023/C 321/75)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: Lotum one GmbH (Bad Nauheim, Germany) (represented by: T. Hogh Holub, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Playtika Santa Monica, LLC (Henderson, Nevada, United States)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: Application for EU figurative mark WORDBLITZ — Application No 18 024 980
Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 March 2023 in Case R 1682/2021-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.