EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-76/11: Action brought on 2 February 2011 — Spain v Commission

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011TN0076

62011TN0076

February 2, 2011
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

19.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 89/27

(Case T-76/11)

2011/C 89/52

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: N. Díaz Abad, acting as Agent)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant requests the Court to:

annul Commission Regulation (EU) No 1004/2010 of 8 November 2010 of operating deductions from certain fishing quotas for 2010 on account of overfishing in the previous year (OJ 2010 L 291, p. 31); and

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant raises four pleas in law in support of its action:

1.First plea in law, based on an error of legal basis, given that the legal basis for the impugned act is Article 105 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009, which entered into force on 1 January 2010, whilst the infringements to which the penalties at issue apply were committed in 2009.

2.Second plea in law, based on breach of the principles of legality and legal certainty, since penalty rules are being applied which were not in force at the time the infringements occurred.

3.Third plea in law, based on breach of the principle of non-retroactivity of less favourable penalty provisions, insofar as less favourable rules are being applied to infringements that occurred in 2009.

4.Fourth plea in law, based on the fact that it may not be left to the Commission to determine the law applicable by reference to the time it chooses to commence an inquiry into a practice.

Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy, amending Regulations (EC) No 847/96, (EC) No 2371/2002, (EC) No 811/2004, (EC) No 768/2005, (EC) No 2115/2005, (EC) No 2166/2005, (EC) No 388/2006, (EC) No 509/2007, (EC) No 676/2007, (EC) No 1098/2007, (EC) No 1300/2008, (EC) No 1342/2008 and repealing Regulations (EEC) No 2847/93, (EC) No 1627/94 and (EC) No 1966/2006 (OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1).

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia