I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(2021/C 320/60)
Language of the case: Swedish
Applicant: Essity Hygiene and Health AB (Gothenburg, Sweden) (represented by: U. Wennermark, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Trade mark at issue: Application for registration of EU figurative mark representing a leaf — Application for registration No 16 709 305
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 31 March 2021 in Case R 2196/2017-1
The applicant claims, primarily, that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision in so far as it refuses the application;
—vary the contested decision by granting the appeal against the examiner’s decision not to grant the application in respect of the goods in Class 16; and
—order EUIPO to pay the applicant’s costs incurred in the proceedings before both the General Court and EUIPO.
The applicant claims, in the alternative, that the Court should:
—order EUIPO to pay the applicant’s costs incurred before the General Court.
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 165(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 and Article 36(1)(g) and 36(2) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.