- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-309/15 P: Appeal brought on 5 June 2015 by CW against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 26 March 2015 in Case F-124/13 CW v Parliament
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015TN0309
62015TN0309
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
20150731056617072015/C 270/463092015TC27020150817EN01ENINFO_JUDICIAL20150605373711
(Case T-309/15 P)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Appellant: CW (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyer)
Other party to the proceedings: European Parliament
Form of order sought by the appellant
The appellant claims that the Court should:
—declare the appeal admissible;
—set aside the judgment under appeal;
—annul the contested decision and the decision rejecting the complaint;
—award damages; and
—order the European Parliament to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the appeal, the appellant relies on two pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging that the Civil Service Tribunal distorted evidence and erred in law in finding that, in the decision rejecting the complaint, the appointing authority sought to endorse the substance of the decision refusing assistance.
2.Second plea in law, alleging that the Civil Service Tribunal distorted evidence and erred in law in considering that the Parliament did not make a manifest error of assessment in its choice of measures and methods for applying Article 24 of the Staff Regulations.