- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-97/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 8 February 2019 — Pfeifer & Langen GmbH & Co. KG v Hauptzollamt Köln
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019CN0097
62019CN0097
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
27.5.2019
Official Journal of the European Union
C 182/11
(Case C-97/19)
(2019/C 182/14)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Pfeifer & Langen GmbH & Co. KG
Defendant: Hauptzollamt Köln
Question referred
Is Article 78(3) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code (1) to be interpreted as meaning that, according to that provision, in a case such as that in the main proceedings, a customs declaration must be checked and corrected in such a way that the particulars relating to the declarant are replaced by the designation of the person to whom an import licence was issued for the imported goods, and this person is represented by the person who was named as the declarant in the customs declaration and who has submitted a power of attorney from the holder of the import licence to the customs office?
(1) OJ 1992 L 302, p. 1.
* * *
Language of the case: German