- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-231/17: Judgment of the General Court of 16 January 2018 — SE v Council (Civil service — Officials — Remuneration — Family allowances — Article 2(2), third sentence, of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations — Concept of ‘dependent child’ — Concept of ‘child whom the official has a responsibility to maintain under a judicial decision based on Member States’ legislation on the protection of minors’ — Refusal to grant dependent child status to the granddaughter of the official)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017TA0231
62017TA0231
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
26.2.2018
Official Journal of the European Union
C 72/36
(Case T-231/17)( (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>))
((Civil service - Officials - Remuneration - Family allowances - Article 2(2), third sentence, of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations - Concept of ‘dependent child’ - Concept of ‘child whom the official has a responsibility to maintain under a judicial decision based on Member States’ legislation on the protection of minors’ - Refusal to grant dependent child status to the granddaughter of the official))
(2018/C 072/47)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: SE (represented by: N. de Montigny, lawyer)
Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and R. Meyer, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application based on Article 270 TFEU and seeking annulment of the Council’s decision of 22 June 2016, by which the appointing authority of that institution refused to recognise that the applicant’s granddaughter was a ‘dependent child’ of the applicant within the meaning of the third sentence of Article 2(2) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court hereby:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders SE to pay the costs.
(<span class="note">1</span>) OJ C 213, 3.7.2017.