EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal, Mr Perillo Ezio of 12 May 2016.#FR v European Aviation Safety Agency.#Amicable settlement of the dispute — Article 91(1) of the Rules of Procedure — Agreement between the parties on the initiative of the Tribunal — Removal from the register.#Case F-51/15.

ECLI:EU:F:2016:120

62015FO0051

May 12, 2016
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

ORDER OF THE EUROPEAN UNION CIVIL SERVICE TRIBUNAL (Single Judge)

12 May 2016 (*1)

‛Amicable settlement of the dispute — Article 91(1) of the Rules of Procedure — Agreement between the parties on the initiative of the Tribunal — Removal from the Register’

In Case F‑51/15,

ACTION brought under Article 270 TFEU, applicable to the EAEC Treaty pursuant to Article 106a thereof,

FR, former member of the temporary staff of the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), residing in Düsseldorf (Germany), represented by L. Levi and A. Blot, lawyers,

applicant,

European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), represented by F. Manuhutu and A. Haug, acting as Agents, and A. Duron, lawyer,

defendant,

THE CIVIL SERVICE TRIBUNAL (Single Judge),

Judge: E. Perillo,

Registrar: W. Hakenberg,

makes the following

By application received at the Tribunal Registry on 27 March 2015, FR brought the present action seeking, essentially, the annulment of the decision of 13 June 2014 by which the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) dismissed him at the end of the extension of his probationary period as a member of the temporary staff and compensation in respect of the material and non-material harm allegedly suffered.

Pursuant to Article 15(1) and (2) of the Rules of Procedure, the First Chamber of the Tribunal, to which the case had been assigned, unanimously decided, the parties having been heard, that the case would be heard and determined by the Judge-Rapporteur sitting as a single Judge.

3.3

At the end of the hearing on 13 April 2016, the single Judge, at the request of the parties, decided to initiate an attempt to reach an amicable settlement.

4.4

After several informal meetings with the single Judge, the parties came to a definitive agreement on a solution bringing the dispute to an end.

The terms of the agreement were recorded in the minutes of 13 April 2016, duly signed by the parties. That agreement also concerns the costs.

It is therefore necessary, pursuant to Article 91(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the Tribunal, to remove the present case from the Register of the Tribunal.

7.7

Under Article 91(3) of the Rules of Procedure, the costs are to be borne by the parties in accordance with the terms of their agreement.

On those grounds,

THE CIVIL SERVICE TRIBUNAL (Single Judge)

hereby orders:

Luxembourg, 12 May 2016.

Registrar

Judge

(*1) Language of the case: English.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia