I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-625/18) (*)
(Civil service - Withdrawal of debit note issued by ESMA - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)
(2020/C 137/75)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: FT (represented by: S. Pappas, lawyer)
Defendant: European Securities and Markets Authority (represented by: G. Filippa and F. Barzanti, acting as Agents)
Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment, first, of ESMA’s letter of 9 August 2018, which was notified to the applicant on 10 August 2018 and by which the ESMA requested reimbursement of EUR 12 000 in relation to costs in the case that gave rise to the judgment of 8 October 2015, FT v ESMA (F-39/14, EU:F:2015:117), and, secondly, of debit note No 4440180170, which was issued by ESMA on 10 August 2018, seeking the reimbursement of that sum.
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.
2.Each party shall bear its own costs.
(*) Language of the case: English.
OJ C 16, 14.1.2019.