I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2008/C 223/86)
Language of the case: German
Applicant: MPDV Mikrolab GmbH, Mikroprozessordatenverarbeitung und Mikroprozessorlabor (Mosbach, Germany) (represented by: W. Göpfert, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
—Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 15 April 2008 in Case R 1525/2006-4;
—Order the defendant to pay the costs.
Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘ROI ANALYZER’ for goods and services in Classes 9, 35 and 42 (Application No 4 866 042).
Decision of the Examiner: Application rejected in part.
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal.
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (1) in that the trade mark applied for does not lack distinctive character and no requirement of availability exists for it.
(1) Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1).