I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-638/22 PPU, (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>) Rzecznik Praw Dziecka and Others (Suspension of the return decision))
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Urgent preliminary ruling procedure - Area of freedom, security and justice - Judicial cooperation in civil matters - Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of decisions in matrimonial matters and in the matters of parental responsibility - International child abduction - 1980 Hague Convention - Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 - Article 11 - Application for return of a child - Final decision ordering the return of a child - Legislation of a Member State providing for automatic suspension of the enforcement of that decision in the event that a request is made by certain national authorities)
(2023/C 127/16)
Language of the case: Polish
Applicants: T.C., Rzecznik Praw Dziecka, Prokurator Generalny
Interested parties: M.C., Prokurator Prokuratury Okręgowej we Wrocławiu
Article 11(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000, read in the light of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,
must be interpreted as precluding a piece of national legislation which confers on authorities that are not courts the power to obtain automatic suspension, for a period of at least two months, of the enforcement of a return decision handed down on the basis of the Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, concluded at the Hague on 25 October 1980, without having to provide reasons for their request for suspension.
Language of the case: Polish
* * *
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 482, 19.12.2022.